• Opening Hours


    MONDAY05:00 AM - 10:00 PM

    TUESDAY05:00 AM - 10:00 PM

    WEDNESDAY05:00 AM - 10:00 PM

    THURSDAY05:00 AM - 10:00 PM

    FRIDAY05:00 AM - 10:00 PM

    SATURDAY08:00 AM - 06:00 PM


  • (617) 773-0996
  • Contact

    Let's Keep In Touch!X

    ADDRESS15 School St Quincy, MA 02169


    Sending your message. Please wait...

    Thanks for sending your message! We'll get back to you shortly.

    There was a problem sending your message. Please try again.

    Please complete all the fields in the form before sending.


Cross Licensing Agreement Definition

By pierre.shaun@gmail.com | In Uncategorized | on December 6, 2020

But cross-licensing is not just an exchange to fend off intellectual property lawyers or reduce licensing fees – it can and should be the basis for future alliances that foster the flow of knowledge and stimulate innovation after licensing. Studies have shown that the success of the duopoly crossing can be greater in favour of a monopoly scenario. Among the main advantages of cross-licensing, the problem seems to be that a market player must essentially license the entire portfolio of each major player in the industry to enter the sector. Without its own patents as bargains, the costs are prohibitive. Costs are not available on existing cross-licensing. The costs are related to the need to cross-reference the patents of market participants. Some examples of cross-licensing for intellectual property are some identifiable companies: in addition to the general benefits, some cross-licensing contracts are based on a state of license, which saves even more money. While the benefits far outweigh the costs, these agreements are legal contracts that companies enter into with their competitors. For this reason, companies considering this type of contract should always consult a qualified lawyer in order to preserve their own interests. [2] www.nytimes.com/2014/01/28/technology/google-and-samsung-sign-broad-cross-licensing-agreement.html?_r=3 cross-licensing agreements have often been negotiated in terms of agreements. The Tribunal will analyze cases in which these are cross-licensing agreements according to the rule of reason, in which the anti-competitive effect of the agreement is taken into account.

In general, these agreements are pro-competitive. One of the main concerns with large-scale cross-licensing agreements is that they create an almost impenetrable barrier to intellectual property rights for newcomers to the sector. One of the restrictions on cross-licensing is that it is ineffective against patent holding companies. The main activity of a patent holding company is to license patents against a silver license. They therefore do not need rights to exercise patents from other companies. These companies are often pejoratively called the patent role. Cross-licensing agreements create a number of important advantages: one of the main concerns about broad cross-licensing agreements is that they create an almost impenetrable barrier to intellectual property rights for newcomers to the sector. The cost of licensing multi-licensing IP can be prohibitive for most start-ups. Antitrust authorities are particularly cautious about cross-licensing portfolios, with provisions that could facilitate competitively disruptive agreements, such as pricing or market sharing.

For example, Intel Inc. has several cross-licensing agreements with Advance Micro Devices Inc. (AMD).1 Google and Samsung also have agreements that cover existing patents, as well as those that will be filed within the next 10 years from the date of the agreements.2 In some sectors, cross-licensing represents a significant portion of all IP management and licensing agreements. For example, according to a recent study by the Toulouse School of Economics, cross-licensing accounts for 50% of all licensing agreements in the telecommunications and broadcasting industries, 25% for electronic components and 23% in the pharmaceutical industry. So, with all these cross-licensing benefits, what can be bad? Here are some of the drawbacks that companies considering ip-cross licensing should take into account: a multi-licensing agreement is a contract between at least two parties that grants reciprocal rights to the intellectual property of both parties.

No Comments to "Cross Licensing Agreement Definition"