In some situations where parents have the same parental leave and income, there may not be child care between their parents. When parents have reached a collaborative agreement that there is no custody of children between them, some courts may accept this agreement if and only if they find that it is in the best interests of the child. The income quota model uses the combined monthly income of parents and the number of children to determine child welfare obligations. Once the obligation to raise children is required, the court uses the proportional contributions of the parents to the combined monthly income to distribute the obligation among themselves. The ultimate goal of child welfare laws is to ensure that children have access to the same standard of living as if they lived together. Most national child promotion laws use one of two ways of determining child welfare obligations. It is helpful to understand the model your state is using because it affects the calculation of your child welfare obligations. The obligation to help a child is not due to marriage. If you are a parent, you are responsible for providing financial assistance to every child you have as a parent. For a parent to benefit from the children, he or she must normally be the “legitimate” parent of a child. A “liberticide” parent is one who has primary physical custody of a child. This usually means that the child (s) lives mainly with his or her parents and that the parent is primarily responsible for the day-to-day care of the child (for example. B day care, the establishment of well-fed childcare, transport of the child to various social activities, etc.).
Family allowances and visits are considered by law to be separate issues. Deal with unique changes to your parenting plan without confusion or conflict with these 3… It is contrary to Indiana law and public policy that the court approve any agreement that provides for custody of children on the basis of promises in other areas. For example, a mother cannot tell the biological father of a child that she will give up supporting children if she promises to stay away from the child. Nor is it a good policy to promise additional assets in the event of divorce in exchange for the abolition or reduction of aid. It is always important to remember that children`s issues can be changed. All agreements or provisions regarding child care, custody or educational time may be amended. Yes, for example. B, one parent agrees to give a pension account to the other parent instead of help, the parent could later request a change of assistance to the court.
The distribution of assets in this situation would not be changeable. The end result would be contrary to the spirit of the original agreement. Check out these 5 examples of 50/50 child care plans so you can choose what you need for your family.